Racial Homogeneity, High Trust Societies, and the Impact of Multiculturalism

A Comparative Analysis of Australia and South Korea

As I travel this world, I often think about how different places compare to Australia, and am deeply concerned about the current state of our nation. Australia's failed attempt at multiculturalism has led to a fractured society, with a decline in social cohesion and national identity. As we examine the successes of South Korea, it is crucial to understand the differences between our two nations in terms of race and societal trust.

South Korea boasts a high degree of racial homogeneity, with a population predominantly ethnic Korean. This homogeneity has contributed to a strong sense of national identity and unity, reflected in high levels of social trust. South Koreans trust their fellow citizens, institutions, and government, fostering a harmonious and cooperative society.

In contrast, Australia's post 1970's version of multiculturalism has led to a diverse population with varying ethnic backgrounds, cultures, and values. This has resulted in a dilution of our national identity and weakening of social cohesion, as our society grapples with the challenges of integrating diverse communities.

The Australian government's insistence on promoting multiculturalism has not only failed to create a cohesive society but has also undermined national security. The lack of assimilation and integration has led to the formation of ethnic enclaves, which in turn has given rise to youth crime and gang-related violence.

South Korea's success in maintaining its homogeneity can be attributed to its strict immigration policies. For instance, in 2012, the South Korean government introduced a policy granting citizenship to foreign-born children of Korean fathers only if they were born within a legal marriage. This policy aimed to preserve the Korean identity and prevent the dilution of their national heritage.

In contrast, Australia's multiculturalism has resulted in the formation of ethnic enclaves, which has led to a decline in social cohesion. For example, in the Sydney suburb of Lakemba, over 60% of the population is of Lebanese descent. This has contributed to issues such as youth crime, gang-related violence, and a sense of alienation from the broader Australian community.

Lakemba, Sydney, Australia

The Australian government's promotion of multiculturalism has also led to the erosion of our national identity and heritage. The removal of Australia Day celebrations in some local councils due to concerns about celebrating a day marking the arrival of British settlers in 1788 is an example of how our national identity is being undermined.

The lack of a cohesive society in Australia has resulted in a decline in social trust and a sense of belonging among many citizens. This has led to a rise in social issues such as youth crime, gang-related violence, and a general sense of disillusionment with the government and its institutions.

In South Korea, the strong sense of national identity and unity has contributed to a high level of social trust, encouraging/promoting a cooperative and harmonious society. This has enabled South Korea to achieve remarkable economic growth and development, as citizens work together to achieve common goals and contribute to the collective good.

The comparative analysis between Australia and South Korea highlights the importance of a cohesive society built on a shared national identity and trust. Australia's failed multiculturalism experiment has led to a fractured society, whereas South Korea's homogeneity and high levels of trust have contributed to their societal harmony and success. It is time for Australia to learn from South Korea and embrace our unique identity to foster a strong, united, prosperous nation. By focusing on sovereignty, economic nationalism, and the preservation of our national heritage, we can build a cohesive society that is unapologetically proud of its identity and values.

FarCue